While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

Company details


Contact info

3.7

Average

TrustScore 3.5 out of 5

1 review

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

No history of asking for reviews

This company hasn't invited their customers, so reviews may not be representative

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

3.7

All reviews

(1)

1 review in the last 12 months

Write a review

We perform checks on reviews

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

As a Former White Hat Hacker, This Is One of the Most Impressive Security Tools I’ve Seen!

I’m coming at Decloak from a somewhat different perspective than the average user. I’m a technology industry professional and former white hat hacker, so I’ve spent enough time around security testing to know the difference between a scanner that spits out a pile of generic warnings and something that actually gives you useful intelligence.

After putting Decloak through its paces across several of my own production sites and applications, I’m extremely impressed.

First, an important qualification: Decloak does not replace a skilled professional penetration tester, nor should any automated platform claim to. Security findings can be contextual, false positives exist, and a human tester who understands an application’s architecture, business logic and threat model can investigate things automation cannot. But professional penetration testing can also cost thousands or tens of thousands of dollars. For the price point here, the breadth and depth of what Decloak provides is frankly remarkable. Its AI-directed crawler actually determines where to investigate rather than simply walking a static sitemap. One of my scans crawled 76 pages and analyzed hundreds of network requests.

The reporting is excellent. You get an immediately understandable A-F score and severity breakdown, but you can drill into individual findings, affected locations, evidence and remediation guidance. Reports also include CVE/CWE/OWASP references and compliance mapping. The exported PDFs are genuinely useful documents rather than an afterthought. My reports included mappings for SOC2, ISO, NIS2, DORA, LGPD and PCI, along with DNS/TLS analysis, platform security and other appendices.

DAST/Active Testing is where things get considerably more interesting. Instead of only analyzing what the application exposes passively, Decloak performs non-destructive probes for things such as forced browsing, CORS configuration, HTTP methods, reflected input, postMessage behavior, Subresource Integrity and sensitive-data patterns. That distinction matters because there is a huge difference between saying “this configuration might be risky” and actually investigating the behavior.

AI Pentesting takes it another step further. Decloak can perform exploitation-confirmation testing using sandboxed security tools including sqlmap, dalfox, ffuf, nuclei and jwt_tool. It also performs API discovery/testing for REST, GraphQL and SOAP endpoints. AppSumo’s listing correctly distinguishes this from DAST: active testing looks for plausible security signals, while AI Pentesting attempts sandboxed exploitation against confirmed findings, with independent scoring.

I also really like the third-party and supply-chain visibility. Modern applications make requests all over the place, and Decloak inventories those domains, analyzes dynamically loaded scripts and checks external domains for reputation signals. This is increasingly important with modern SaaS and AI-built applications.

Another standout is the platform-specific analysis. Decloak is looking for common problems involving platforms not merely applying a generic checklist to every website.

If I could request one improvement, it would be context-aware feedback on findings. I’d love to click a potential finding and explain why it is intentional or not applicable in my architecture, then have Decloak retain that context for subsequent scans and AI analysis. Security is inherently contextual, so allowing the human operator to teach the system why a particular finding is a non-issue would make an already impressive platform even better.

Overall, this feels less like another automated website scanner and more like a growing security workbench. Between agentic crawling, DAST, AI pentesting, API discovery, third-party analysis, remediation guidance, compliance mapping and genuinely professional reports, there is an extraordinary amount here.

For developers, agencies, SaaS operators and technology companies that cannot justify having a professional pentester continuously testing every release, Decloak fills an extremely valuable gap at a fraction of the cost.

Easy 5 stars from me.

September 29, 2026
Unprompted review

Is this your company?

Claim your profile to access Trustpilot’s free business tools and connect with customers.

Get free account

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look