Average experience with too many problems and an overly inflated price
Former tenant (2023-2025)
Very well-linked area: the building is close to the station and high street, with many stores nearby. The location is convenient for transport and shopping, though the area can feel unsafe at times.
The development itself is basic, with a small lobby, bin room, and roof terrace. The so-called “co-working space” is simply a table in the lobby, where people constantly walk in and out, making it impossible to concentrate.
They market themselves as “pet friendly,” but tenants are charged £75 per pet each month, plus mandatory professional cleaning and fumigation at move-out according to the contract. In practice, this feels more like a surcharge than genuine pet-friendliness.
Security is weak. Parcels often went missing, and during my tenancy the parcel room code was changed only once. The main entrance frequently failed to lock, leaving the building accessible to anyone, which is not ideal for Lewisham.
The flats are of low quality, with recurring maintenance issues. Each one oddly includes a bike listed in the inventory (which in my case was rusty and unusable), which cannot be removed and only takes up space.
We also went without hot water for over two months in winter due to the boiler breaking, despite paying a fixed £80 per month for heating and hot water. Management’s suggestion was to shower during “off-peak hours,” which didn’t help, and it was extremely frustrating as one of the people in my flat was pregnant.
After moving out, the heating and hot water reconciliation turned into another long and frustrating adventure. The figures I was given were wrong FIVE separate times, each one underpaying me by hundreds of pounds. The errors were explained as “wrong templates,” “bad Excel formulas,” and even a claim that tenants were responsible for boiler maintenance and operational costs, which was only taken back by the regional manager after I cited the law and the tenancy contract they had written. I eventually requested the supplier invoices myself (which they hadn’t provided at first) and discovered that the actual rates were more than three times lower than those used in their calculations. After proving that the correct refund was over £900, not the £200 they had initially calculated, I had to escalate the matter all the way to the regional manager, who again got the amount wrong and blamed it on Excel before finally correcting it. I have also seen a neighbour’s reconciliation, and their figures were even higher than mine, which suggests that similar mistakes may have affected other residents as well.
The landlord, Greystar, runs the building in a very corporate way. Decisions often seem driven by process, liability, and reputation management rather than fairness or basic empathy. For instance: we requested early release from the lease towards the end of it after 2 years by providing two months’ notice as one of my flatmates was due to give birth and needed to find a new place. The request was denied, with the contract cited as the reason. Also, to this day they keep claiming that fixing the boilers after two months without hot water was an “extra effort” on their part, rather than a basic obligation to provide an essential service that tenants were already paying for. This kind of response reflects a culture where protecting the company seems to take priority over taking responsibility or showing understanding and basic empathy toward residents.
In short:
Good - location and shops.
Bad - corporate management, unreliable maintenance, excessive fees, and repeated billing errors.
Honestly, save yourself the frustration and steer clear. There are plenty of other places, and this one has nothing special to offer except headaches.








