gamedeveloper.com Reviews 2

TrustScore 3 out of 5

2.9

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

2.9

Average

TrustScore 3 out of 5

2 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Biased to push naratives

This isn't a good website for Game developers. They don't do enough research to make sure the data they're working with is accurate. There's a ton of evidence for this but one of the more recent ones is their article titled: "Data and player sentiment highlight the value of authentic LGBTQ narratives". Their source in this article is the GLAAD Gaming Report. That is an organisation that has motivation to push the narrative that this is what gamers want. They don't mention this in the article. If you do your own investigation and look at the data and figures in their report, you can clearly see how they've fudged the results by targeting specific audience groups who would likely provide the answers that they want. What they should have written about is the reality is that 80+% of console gamers are straight men. There's a lot of data to support this including Capcom's own recent survey results, which they could have referenced. Guess what straight men don't really want in their games? LGBTQ narratives and romances. At best they'll sit through it and wonder why it's there, at worse they'll refund the game/trade it in and rant online about how bad the devs are. This site should be asking why 90%+ of the games that have these things shoehorned in do worse both financially and in player reviews? And more importantly why are sites like Gamedeveloper.com not competent enough to pick up non this. There's a ton of examples like this on this website. Here's the thing, Game devs, if you want to believe these narratives are what players want then go ahead. It's not my company or money you're wasting. It's not me who'll be out of a job when the games don't meet sales expectations. A website with this name and purpose should probably care more about how what they publish affects the long term job prospects of the people who read their site.

April 15, 2026
Unprompted review

Is this your company?

Claim your profile to access Trustpilot’s free business tools and connect with customers.

Get free account

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.

Learn more about other kinds of reviews.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look