I have worked for a company that uses…
I have worked for a company that uses this software, and my experience has been overwhelmingly negative. The system creates unnecessary conflict between providing quality customer support and maintaining strict adherence metrics. In many cases, representatives are forced to choose between assisting customers effectively or complying with the rigid scheduling imposed by the software.
For example, if a call overlaps with a scheduled break or lunch, the system frequently fails to update. Placing a customer on hold during this time does not register properly, and calls that run through scheduled activities—such as casework, or meetings—also fail to adjust the schedule accurately. Even when the system does update, it does not account for subsequent activities, resulting in reduced time allotted for essential tasks. Anything more than the most basic workflow appears to fall outside the software’s capabilities.
If a company’s priority is strict agent adherence with minimal emphasis on customer experience, this tool may be suitable. However, for organizations that expect agents to prioritize customer needs before administrative metrics, this software is unlikely to be a good fit.
Additionally, my limited interactions with the support team have been disappointing. Responses to inquiries are vague and often conclude with, “This is not within the scope of Intradiem.” If a standard action—such as placing a customer on hold to gather necessary information—disrupts the system’s processes, then the process itself needs to be reevaluated.
In my opinion any company would be far better served by having supervisors/managers make manual adjustments.








