Miraheze Reviews 

21
TrustScore 3 out of 5

3.2

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

See what reviewers are saying

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

They have a forking policy that straight up just tells you to go f*** yourself. You're forever locked into their farm with no way out, and when you've used their service. Oh, you know how terrible t... See more

Company replied

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I recently moved my fanon home wiki from Fandom to Miraheze over a year ago, and we've been more traction after we closed the original Fandom wiki when our full database (40,000+ edits and over close... See more

Company replied

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

It's a less intuitive wiki hosting site than Fandom. It's usable. But I prefer Fandom. It bugs me that people are switching. I would actually 5-star this if the two brands made a deal that lets... See more

Company replied

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I have been using this for a while now and I have had absolutely no problems with it. A highly customizable, fast, ad free wiki hosting platform. Really easy to learn and get used to it. Much better t... See more

Company replied

Company details

Information provided by various external sources

Miraheze is an open source project that offers free MediaWiki hosting, for everyone. Request your free wiki today!


Contact info

3.2

Average

TrustScore 3 out of 5

21 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

No recent history of asking for reviews

This company hasn't invited customers recently, so reviews may not be representative

Replied to 100% of negative reviews

Typically takes over 1 month to reply

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

3.2

All reviews

(21)

3 reviews in the last 12 months

Write a review
Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Horrible uptime and service

They have a forking policy that straight up just tells you to go f*** yourself. You're forever locked into their farm with no way out, and when you've used their service. Oh, you know how terrible their uptime is, maintenance is constant, and I'm not even sure what the 'maintenance' is. It never did anything good.

The people who preach about how great this farm is are just delusional. Do yourself a favor and go to wiki.gg.

January 14, 2026
Unprompted review
Miraheze logo

Reply from Miraheze

Hi, I'm sorry to hear that you had a negative experience.

I'm not sure what you refer to when you mention the forking policy. Miraheze provides an easy to use special page (Special:DataDump) which allows users to easily export all their content and images, which is more than most other farms.

As for maintenance, this is very infrequent and necessary to continue improving the farm.

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Fantastic service!

I recently moved my fanon home wiki from Fandom to Miraheze over a year ago, and we've been more traction after we closed the original Fandom wiki when our full database (40,000+ edits and over close to 600 images/pages) were transferred. After it was transferred, and we closed down the original Fandom wiki, we enabled the necessary extensions and a customizable skin, and we've officially made Miraheze our new home! Aside from the occasional downtimes and the odd 5xx errors, I love the friendly and positive community Miraheze has, and they've been very helpful on the CSS forefront. So far, we've had no problems with Miraheze and our editors there have been getting used to the new customized Refreshed skin to go along with this, something we could NEVER do with Fandom.

January 13, 2026
Unprompted review
Miraheze logo

Reply from Miraheze

Thank you very much for the kind words, Miraheze is glad you appreciate our service! :)

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

Please stop switching...

It's a less intuitive wiki hosting site than Fandom.
It's usable.

But I prefer Fandom.
It bugs me that people are switching.
I would actually 5-star this if the two brands made a deal that lets wiki hosts update the other site to copy the one that's being looked at

September 23, 2025
Unprompted review
Miraheze logo

Reply from Miraheze

Hi, thank you for your review. It's unfortunate that you find Miraheze less intuitive, as we believe we provide a range of tools to make mediawiki easier to use. Miraheze always values feedback, so if you would let us know what doesn't feel intuitive it would help us improve the service.

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Great site

Great site! I use and edit multiple wikis. No censorship like Fandom which deleted several of my wikis. Fandom also has annoying ads which Miraheze does not.

August 12, 2025
Unprompted review
Miraheze logo

Reply from Miraheze

Thank you for your review, we appreciate it!

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I HATE YOU MIRAHEZE

I HATE MIRAHEZE THEY DECLINED MY WIKI REQUEST MIRAHEZE SUCKS YEAH FANDOM IS TRASH BUT FANDOM IS INFINITELY BETTER I HATE YOU MIRAHEZE

May 30, 2025
Unprompted review
Miraheze logo

Reply from Miraheze

Hi, I'm sorry you feel this way. Miraheze has a Content Policy to ensure that wikis respect certain common rules. If users are unhappy with how a wiki request was handled, they can ask a Steward to review it.

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Perfect wiki hosting service!

I have been using this for a while now and I have had absolutely no problems with it. A highly customizable, fast, ad free wiki hosting platform. Really easy to learn and get used to it. Much better than other competitors. The community is also very active and supportive!

December 13, 2024
Unprompted review
Miraheze logo

Reply from Miraheze

Thanks for the kind words!

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

A lot of wiki are refused

A lot of wiki are refused. Approval is managed by a guy who started a year ago. Strict rule.

November 6, 2024
Unprompted review
Miraheze logo

Reply from Miraheze

Hi. Miraheze has a Content Policy and a Global Conduct Policy to ensure that our wikis adhere to some minimal standards. It is not true that most wikis are refused and in fact the vast majority of wiki requests are approved. It is also not true that approvals are managed by "a guy". There are multiple volunteers who help review and create wikis, some of which have been volunteers at Miraheze for years.
Unfortunately it seems that this review is completely based on information that is completely inaccurate.
If you believe that your wiki has been unjustly or unfairly refused, you are more than free to contact us and we will be happy to have another look at the request.

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Unreliable source

They mix true with false information

September 30, 2024
Unprompted review
Miraheze logo

Reply from Miraheze

Hi. Miraheze is a wiki host and given that we currently host more than 11.000 wikis it is not possible for us to individually check all the information on our platform and determine whether it is accurate or not. If you have identified information on an individual wiki that you believe is false, that is likely to be contrary to our Content Policy and this can be reported to us by the methods indicated on our website.

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

A great wiki host

I've been using Miraheze for more than a year now. I don't think the negative reviews are fair at all. Although Miraheze has definitely had its downsides and issues over time, it's absolutely the best you can get, especially considering that it's entirely free and volunteer-run. There is a bit of a learning curve, but I don't mind, and I really like using the site and creating and editing wikis on it. It's soo much better than wiki hosts like Fandom, no ads, no selling out, and great volunteer help. Many of the negative reviews here have been really poorly-written, just complaining about specific pages on Miraheze wikis. Miraheze does not create or endorse wiki content, they should complain to Miraheze Stewards about the bad content. As for that review mentioning the data loss incident, that has been over a year ago now and massive changes have been made to internal infrastructure to prevent it from happening again. Also, that incident was kind of the fault of the hosting provider, they physically disconnected a running server improperly, nobody at Miraheze had any control over that.

May 3, 2024
Unprompted review
Miraheze logo

Reply from Miraheze

Thank you for your kind review, we're glad that you've been generally satisfied with the service :)

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Decent and free wiki host

Decent.
+ lots of control over your wiki (including extensions, skins, user groups, and the option to have a private wiki). I think this is about the most control over Mediawiki settings you can have without actually running your own instance of Mediawiki
+ good responses from volunteers. sometimes support requests get lost in the Discord if things are really busy but usually you'll get a response if you make a support thread or just ask again
+ little interference from above. they're not gonna force random changes without approval from the community.

- service can be unstable at times (server hiccups, 504s, though large outages are rare). they seem to be quite underfunded and understaffed, so I understand. it's not a big issue for my hobby project.

I personally haven't really had a problem with any toxic users or anything, I think that's something that depends more on the local community and climate rather than the wiki host (whether that be Fandom or Miraheze or any other).

Overall my experience with Miraheze has been good, and I recommend people seriously consider it as an option when they want to make a wiki.

February 6, 2024
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Free, friendly, and awesome wiki host

I moved my wiki to Miraheze in June after struggling with bad wiki hosts that bloated your wiki with ads and self-hosting which was so hard and ever since then, my users have not been happier!!

Whenever I needed help, Miraheze's volunteer team was there helping me on Discord and on their community noticeboard even when I asked questions like about CSS or JavaScript or basic things like how to rename users. Their stewards also joined my local community and Discord and answered users questions or solved them for them which was a huge help because there were so many new things to learn but because they use MediaWiki it was easy to get adapted to it.

All the other farms I had tried to use were bloated with ads or ran a very old MediaWiki version which made things unusable, bots broken, and more. I was so surprised to see that Miraheze had hundreds of extensions available for me to choose and that they ran the latest MediaWiki version.

With no ads, a responsive support team, good software support and friendly people everywhere, it was really refreshing to see that services like this still exist in this day and age where every farm seeks to maximize the most money possible while giving you crumbs in terms of support and usability. They're completely non-profit and don't have any paid employees, everything is done by their highly motivated volunteers which is surprising. I've been suggesting Miraheze to everyone I know because the fact that they exist is amazing!! I appreciate what they do and leave them a good donation for their work.

February 4, 2023
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

You Get What You Pay For

This is my personal experience using Miraheze since September 2022.

My initial experience was mostly positive: completely free, no ads, customizable. Plus a few negatives: slow-ish load times, lots of downtime, a large and unnecessary Miraheze announcement banner, limited MediaWiki extensions.

But suddenly, on November 16, my wiki went down. Apparently due to an unknown database error, the last 3 months of edits on 1200 wikis—including mine—were lost. The previous backups were from August 2022—before my wiki and any of its hundreds of articles were created. After two weeks of unclear (misleading) messaging, Miraheze admitted that there was little chance of data recovery on November 29. Additionally they had no plans for professional data recovery due to its estimated cost. A few days later, I opted to recreate my wiki on Miraheze from scratch. To make up for lost time, I wrote and rewrote many articles from the information in my local notes. I was making peace with losing the first version of my wiki and was able to improve many pages with more templates and wiki experience. I intended from then on to create my own local backups—but the 'download datadump' feature was disabled temporarily due to other maintenance. I later learned that the feature was re-enabled on December 13.

A mere five days after I could have created my first backup, the wiki went down again on December 18. The next day, Miraheze announced that—fortunately—they were able to recover the thought-to-be-unrecoverable backups from November. Quote: "We apologise for yet another downtime on these wikis but this incident has helped foment stronger backup procedures to prevent catastrophic disasters from occurring." They told me my old wiki would be merged with my latest edits after they transferred some data. But one week of downtime later, on December 26, they admitted that—and apparently this really happened—someone unplugged a hard drive while in use, and—for wikis alphabetically after "O"—their edits after November 25 were completely lost. No chance of recovery.

So I've been burned by Miraheze twice. It goes without saying that none of this is remotely acceptable—but the reality is you get what you pay for. No guarantees, no reliability, no accountability. If your wiki is worth more than $50 a year to you then there is no reason to choose Miraheze over a commercial web host. Why is Miraheze the only free wiki farm with no ads? Because you'd be naïve to run one and you'd have to be stupid to rely on one. I was stupid!

December 26, 2022
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Miraheze - Gold standard of wiki hosting.

Miraheze has come a long way since earlier reviews, establishing a stronger content policy to deal with problematic hosted content/communities all while continually improving available features and platform stability.

While new wiki administrators may find a learning curve compared to other hosting options, I consider Miraheze the gold standard in ad-free/free-to-host wikifarms and have no reservations in recommending them to others.

October 11, 2022
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Never use it

Toxic users have plagued this website making people like what they like instead of having your own opinion and will even make sure you never have an unpopular opinion and harass you for it. They need to get rid of their stupid reception wikis now!

June 21, 2022
Unprompted review
Miraheze logo

Reply from Miraheze

This is not true. While there have been a few issues with so-called 'toxic wikis' in the past these are prohibited by our Content Policy and are shut down on discovery. Miraheze hosts over 5000 wikis and the vast majority are definitely NOT toxic. This comment seems limited to 'Reception wikis' which have been subsequently closed and deleted and is not an accurate representation of the Miraheze community as a whole.

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Surprised to see the negative reviews

Surprised to see the negative reviews. In my experience Miraheze staff have been very kind and helpful to me and have guided me with creating my wiki and were especially useful with CSS/JS. I would certainly recommend this wonderful project if you don't want to spend time and money hosting your own wiki

June 7, 2022
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Excellent service for no charge

Excellent service for no charge. I am very impressed by Miraheze and other than being slow at times (which to me is understandable for a project which relies on donations only) it has been exactly what my small start-up project needed.

June 7, 2022
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

This site is horrible

This site is horrible, with their Celebtard page. They called nice VAs, like Grey, a Clebtard, all because of a minor thing, and that they think she was some
part of some KickVic movement, which is a movement that was made by a former Channel Awesome person, that defamed him for false Sexual Harassment allegations. I don’t recommend this site.

March 21, 2021
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

This network is toxic

This network is toxic. It seems that the owners of this network have no problem letting people create pages to attack specific people on the internet. Harassing them in sites where these people are active. If they would allow this type of behavior, people would warn others against their network as it should now.

July 29, 2020
Unprompted review
Miraheze logo

Reply from Miraheze

The behavior you describe is not allowed per our Content Policy and Code of Conduct. Reports sent to our volunteers are usually dealt with swiftly and the behavior you describe is certainly not tolerated and such pages are removed.

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look