Ofsearchengines Reviews 

1
•
TrustScore 3 out of 5

3.2

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more


Contact info

3.2

Average

TrustScore 3 out of 5

1 review

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

No history of asking for reviews

This company hasn't invited their customers, so reviews may not be representative

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

3.2

All reviews

(1)

0 reviews in the last 12 months

Write a review

We perform checks on reviews

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Fake independent comparison site promoting its own businesses

This is a supposedly independent comparison website that, based on my extensive technical investigation, is operated by the same people behind JuicySearch.

The site claims to independently compare 45 OnlyFans search engines. Remarkably, JuicySearch ranks number one, while two other websites associated with the same operators also appear in the top five.

Three of the top five positions, out of 45 competitors. What an extraordinary coincidence.

I have completed an exhaustive technical investigation into the connections between these websites. I am confident they are operated by the same people, and I have retained technical evidence to substantiate my findings.

The operators have gone to considerable lengths to conceal these connections, including using different hosting providers and technologies. However, those measures have not hidden the technical evidence linking the websites.

The comparison site also claims that anonymity is necessary to protect its reviewers. In my view, this is a convenient explanation for concealing the commercial interests behind what is presented as an independent review service.

The problem is not promoting your own websites. The problem is pretending that the recommendations are independent when you are effectively recommending yourself.

Under the EU Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (2005/29/EC), misleading consumers through deceptive presentation or withholding material commercial information can constitute an unlawful commercial practice.

I was going to force JuicySearch to take it down... but.... it's funnier to see it stay live, so I hope they keep it up so their shame can be seen by all.

Consumers deserve genuine comparisons, not what appears to be a carefully constructed advertising exercise disguised as independent advice.

If a comparison website gives three of its own associated businesses the top five positions, readers are entitled to question the credibility of every ranking it publishes.

November 4, 2026
Unprompted review

Is this your company?

Claim your profile to access Trustpilot’s free business tools and connect with customers.

Get free account

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look