I give this 2 stars only because the support is decent, but everything else is a complete waste of time/money. They make you believe that a beginner can build and automate a profitable trading strateg... See more
Company replied
While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more
To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more
See what reviewers are saying
I’ve been trading manually for almost 6 years now and keep going on/off because I feel like it’s boring to sit in front a screen all day. I saw the videos of Roboquant pass multiple times before I bit... See more
Company replied
If you are tired of throwing your money away on someone else’s algo, if you have no coding experience but want to create, if you have an idea for a bot but don’t want to pay someone else to do it, if... See more
Company replied
Been with Roboquant for a few months now and I am very impressed. The knowledge base of the system is great and gets better every day. I started with zero coding knowledge and I've managed to code 2 d... See more
Company replied
3.9
Great
25 reviews
Replied to 85% of negative reviews
Typically takes over 1 month to reply
How this company uses Trustpilot
See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.
Waste of money
After wasting waay too much money on tokens, I got.. 0 good things from it. It somestimes messes up simple things as combining new things with the old code it gave, when I literally give it the code. I wasted way too much sushi money for this bad experience. You first have to pay the creators, you then have to pay for the AI, which is super expensive. You burn through 20$ like it's nothing . You're better off with Claude AI, as half of the experience was debugging things with Gemini and Claude. This platform HAS Claude and ChatGPT APIs, which is ironic, because the "clueless" Claude that's free for some queries will probably do more than this money pit... and it'll be free.
February 12, 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Roboquant
Hi, thanks for the feedback. We hear you on the cost concern.
To clarify: the platform itself is free to use. You only pay for the AI tokens you consume, and the cost per model is transparently shown in the model dropdown before you use it. Paid plans ($15/mo and up) unlock additional features and include free credits. So the pricing is fully transparent — you always know what you're spending before you spend it.
We've also been continuously improving the AI models and code generation quality, particularly around maintaining context when modifying existing code — which sounds like the issue you ran into.
The value over using a generic AI directly is the trading-specific layer: strategy templates, Pine Script and MQL generation tuned for trading, backtesting analysis, chart recognition, and broker connectivity. If you'd like to give the updated platform a try, reach out at info@roboquant.dev.
ROBOQUANT SCAM AND MISLEADING. Don’t bother guys. No wonder they aren’t on this.
Ok so Roboquant is a bit of a scam as it’s not clear, it’s basally chat GPT polished up for coding, when you subscribe you get £1 AI credits, so to use the tool you have to pay for credits. Absolutely scam of a thing. I wouldn’t bother.
January 13, 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Roboquant
Hi Jason, sorry about your experience. Let us clarify.
The platform is free to start — no subscription required. You only pay for the AI tokens you use, and the cost per model is shown transparently in the model dropdown before every request. Paid plans ($15/mo+) give you extra features and include free credits, but the base platform costs nothing.
As for the AI: yes, it runs on models like Claude and GPT. What RoboQuant adds is specialized trading functionality — 50+ tested strategy templates, Pine Script and MQL5 generation optimized for trading, backtesting tools, chart analysis, and automated broker execution. It's the tooling built around the core AI that provides the value.
We appreciate this feedback — it's helped us improve how we communicate pricing. If you'd like to revisit, we're at info@roboquant.dev.
Dont subscribe
Honestly its not worth even going into. But what he says he is selling and what he actually sells is 2 different things. You can look into myfxbook for his real results. unless he deletes them which wont be a surprise.
You wouldnt create a pay for community and advertise it so much if you are making as much as he says on bots.
December 1, 2025
Unprompted review
Reply from Roboquant
Hi Martin, thanks for the feedback.
Our Myfxbook results are public, live, and independently verified — not backtests. Tradepilot Gold EA has been running for 3+ years with verified performance. Anyone can check the live results directly on Myfxbook.
As for why we teach: we're builders. We built RoboQuant because we believe algorithmic trading should be accessible to everyone, not just developers. The academy funds continued development of both the bots and the platform. Many successful trading firms monetize through products and education — the two aren't mutually exclusive.
If you felt the membership didn't deliver, we'd like to understand what was missing. Reach out at info@roboquant.dev.
Bad Experience
Unfortunately, I was disappointed with the results, as they did not match the promises made when I joined the teaching. I was led to believe that within 30 days, as stated, I would be able to create an EA even as a complete beginner with no prior coding experience. However, the course involved significant coding and lacked the clear, step-by-step guidance I expected. The video materials also felt unstructured, which made it difficult to follow and achieve the promised results.
As my expectations were not met, I regret to say that I withdrew from the program, unfortunately, without having my payments refunded. I am disappointed with the outcome, as it did not reflect the promises made when I enrolled. The program stated that even beginners with no coding knowledge would be able to create and successfully run an EA within 30 days, but in reality, the course requires prior trading experience and extensive coding skills, and also lacks clear, step-by-step instructions. The videos felt unstructured, and I was unable to reach the expected results within the expected time frame. For these reasons, I would like to discontinue my participation and request a refund of my payments accordingly.
By the way, the AI-created answer below is completely wrong. None of those services was provided as promised by selling me the "deal".
November 1, 2025
Unprompted review
Reply from Roboquant
Hi Moti, thank you for sharing your perspective. We'd like to provide some important context.
Our records show we went above and beyond to support you. Our team member Ronit joined multiple one-on-one calls with you personally. We helped you install EAs hands-on during community calls. You had full access to Discord support, weekly calls, and direct ticket support — all included in your plan.
Our course is designed for beginners with no coding experience — the AI generates the code for you. But it does require active engagement: following the modules, asking questions when stuck, and participating in the community. Our Discord logs show minimal questions from your end, which makes it hard for us to help when we don't know where you're stuck.
We always encourage members to reach out — that's what the support is there for. If you'd like to reconnect, email us at info@roboquant.dev.
SCAMMERS
This company sold a subscription to a profitable NAS bot in the financial market with the promise that if it didn't make a profit within 30 days, they would refund my money. I tested this bot and another model for GOLD for 30 days and only saw losses. I tried several times to contact support, but they only made excuses—it's nothing more than a scam!
I canceled the subscription and asked for my money back, but they refuse to refund me. I filed a claim with my bank against these scammers and attached proof of the bot losing money for four weeks, my requests for help from support, their fabricated excuses, and the bots that show profits in the backtest but never work in a real account.
Don't fall for this scam!
October 4, 2025
Unprompted review
Reply from Roboquant
Hi Anderson, we understand the frustration when live results don't match expectations.
A few important points:
Our refund policy — clearly stated before purchase — explicitly notes that EA live performance is not grounds for a refund. No trading bot can guarantee profits, and we have never claimed otherwise. Backtesting and live trading will always differ due to spreads, slippage, and market conditions.
Our Tradepilot Gold EA runs on a live, independently verified Myfxbook account with 3+ years of tracked performance. A 4-week drawdown is normal in any trading system — even the most profitable strategies have losing periods. That doesn't make it a scam.
If you'd like help optimizing your setup or understanding the EA's risk parameters, reach out at info@roboquant.dev.
The Trustpilot Experience
Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.
Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.
Learn more about other kinds of reviews.
We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.
Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.
Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.
Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.
Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.