Screen Rant Reviews 

Bullshit articles about nothing. Titles are typed out in a way to trick the algorithm into showing you their website because they use every buzz word possible. I've read more of their articles than I'd like to admit. There's no journalism here.

Never the correct info in the page and misleading.

Every article relating to any fandom content boils down to poorly researched inpertinent drivel that fails to take into account even surface level knowledge of the topics.

I genuinely feel like they don’t know what they’re talking about. Wet paper palette and no imagination. Don’t even get me started on the clickbait.

AI generated slop articles and reviews that have clear bias funded by the production companies of movies they are reviewing.

BS clickbait website. Never click on their links

Please go back to the previous format of Screen Rant. It was quick and efficient. Now it's one channel at a time; this is slow and cumbersome. I rarely use screen rant anymore.

This was single handedly the dumbest article I have ever read. I cannot believe there are people who are this stupid alive today. How can you manage to complete tasks such as breathing and holding your molecules into a shape?

Lacking in inclusivity and diversity

Awful content, clearly AI driven articles but somehow worse written than anything I've seen AI churn out. Clickbait headlines. Embarrassing website overall.

Clickbait, ragebait and activism articles, likely written by AI. The site is no longer worth going to. I've seen a lot of credible evidence that a lot of their writers have been replaced by AI writers that push out one of the three types of articles listed above. You can test this yourself, ask Grok or ChatGPT to analyse one of thier articles and confirm if it was written by an AI. It'll come back as yes. Look up some of their journalists that wrote the article, look at their lack of past workplaces. Look at their near non-existent social media presence.

The articles are lacking any sort of purpose or deeper complexity e.g. "some say that star wars is good", "many credible sources think that this was a Oscar winning performance", like where's the proof of this? Where's the quote from someone influential and worth listening to? Where's the weight behind this article to make it worth reading?

Do yourself a favour and block them from your news feeds. So that your algorithms will give you a better news source.

Flat out annoying and wrong maybe AI Maybe just a desperate paid reach for clicks and distractions

clickbait and full of nonsense, this is not press

Extremely untrustworthy and biased. appears to be paid to say baseless things trying to sway public opinion.
Unethical and the worst media.

Click bait
No integrity in its reporting
Reports LIES and misinformation
Worse than Newscorpse

Speculative clickbait, pretending to have scoops on hotly anticipated movies/series, then you find out it's just baseless guessing or old news. E.g. see their recent article "The Winds Of Winter Already Revealed A Horrifying Fate For One Forgotten Daenerys Villain From Game Of Thrones". Ooh, an update on the final novel you think. Then it goes on to reference 'The Forsaken', a preview chapter which has been about for over 8 years!

I've come to see trust pilot and the narcissistic dark review site. By picking up poor troubles that one most friendly things in Star Trek by saying from somehow it's inconsistent for Star Trek to not vilify troubles because they attacked Queen onto something strange like that makes no sense at all.

For an electric Star Trek fan author he seems to sure hate the ideal of Star Trek, in his very narcissistic extremely picky and overlays Dallas critiques of Star Trek episodes, and of all things to based part of that on track shorts I never watched any of doubt many tricky fans do.
Nothing against the reviewer you just gets a little old to see Star Trek under constant ridicule from almost nothing.

Deleting comments that are respectfully written, just disagreeing with the article in a polite manner.

If they don't want feedback, they should not advertise that: "We want to hear from you! Share your opinions in the thread below and remember to keep it respectful."

In September, I was accepted onto a training program at Screen Rant as a TV and Movies Features Journalist. I passed training and was accepted into Screen Rant Academy, where new writers work closely with two editors to learn and grow. That was the beginning of the end.

Long story short, they dropped me without warning. After pretending to care about you, your work, and your process, and after pretending to support you, they drop you randomly. I was told I had a good grasp of Screen Rant's style. I was told my analysis and my editorial was great. I was told that I write well-written articles. And yet they drop me because of...*checks notes*..."low performance." Which is B.S.

If I were you, I would avoid writing for Screen Rant, and be wary of Valnet overall. They do not care about you at all. The editors I was working with did not even have the decency to tell me that I was underperforming, as they told me the opposite. They did not even have the courtesy to fire me or let me know that it was not working. I found out through an EMAIL from HR and I was removed from ALL THEIR PLATFORMS before I even got to say goodbye.

So not only do they not care. They dispose of you without a thought and abandon you after playing charades - by pretending to care.

What I learnt from this role is to stay away from companies like this. Everything about this place is abysmal. The editors, who are notoriously bad at their jobs and publish articles with mistakes, decided that I was not the right fit? Right.

Anywhere, even a warehouse, is better than Screen Rant.