Screen Rant Reviews 

try to read an article am greeted with "please sign up to continue reading" f*#k you

Screen rant writes anything to make a story without any research and also totally ignores how good a movie is because the critics hate it even though the audience loved it.

Used to casually enjoy their articles and podcasts, even though they'd occasionally spoil films with their titles. Since bringing in the account sign in, I'm out.

I have been reading articles on screen rant for years and now when I go to read an article on their site they block the screen and demand that I create an account and sign in with my email in order to continue to read anything else on their site. I'm done to hell with screen rant and their stupid sister site cbr!!

I saw many articles of screenrant, and there's literally just one thing I can do: rant

It's one thing to just disagree with someone, but the writers of this site are just writing nonsense.
Half the time it feels like they only talk around the subject and even at the end never really having a point.
Or they state utterly nonsense as a somewhat fact, while it's clear that it's just their opinion and not only being far from being a fact, but simply being wrong which, other than their opinion, is most of the time a fact.
I can't recommend this site, it's just a waste of time and only leads to people being disinformed.

One of the worst writers, not sure why they get paid for making irrelevant movie lists. For example the Gilmore Girls article where Lorelai would’ve been different in today’s society. All their writer, Aya T. had to say was about social media and dating apps 🤦‍♀️. Is this all we do today, post pictures on Instagram, make videos on TikTok and go on dating sites? Was this written by a 14 year old? How pathetic and boring. It took her ten paragraphs to talk about nothing. This page should really have a like and dislike button and comment section.

These writers should be ashamed of themselves. They contribute heavily to the standardization of publishing personal (uninformed) opinion as journalism. That it’s done in the context of entertainment should not mean that they have license to fabricate. And they do it so liberally that the average reader will detect the farse readily, even without being and expert in the area.
In the article that I just read, the whole narrative was encased with the plot and scenes of a very successful and entertaining movie, as if it were a documentary, with a few additional facts inserted; such that the very structure of the “article” betrayed the author’s plagiarist intent - her ink, brush and canvas all at once.
I had a similar experience some time ago with screenrant, which seem to validate the negative reviews in a very specific way.
This is unfortunate enough to compel someone to write a review like this one, never read a screenrant piece again, and warn others not to waste their time doing so (if they have any regard for accuracy at all).

Screen rant ‘journalists’ are generally poor at their job and some of the takes are bizarre and just, well, dogpoo. Do not trust this site for genuinely interrogative and critically curious commentary.

Click bait article titles, written by people that obviously have no idea what they are talking about. Read any article and it becomes apparent most of what the say is made up, for example "Starfield might save Xbox series X" or "Sony PS5 disaster gets worse" and "Nintendo Switch struggles to be relevant." None of these consoles are having problems, S/X and PS5 have been selling out for over a year now. The Switch is the highest selling console since the PS2. The site is a harbor for talentless opportunist "journalists".

Screen rant just posted an article where they lied about Amazon listening to "Fans" in relation to Rings Of Power... Amazon is most likely lying about this seeing as they lied about having used an Tolkien expert when they in fact fired said individual very early on because of his input.

Screen Rant only posts click bait articles that in themselves only contain political rants and or even lies as their reporters don't actually do any investigative work beyond what they perceive as political.

Screenrant is trash, repetitive and just annoying. They don't have good writers. Reading their headlines only annoys me. Most of what they write is click bait and exaggerated.

Every ScreenRant headline I've clicked on — every single one — has turned out to be misleading or just a lie.

"Devs Season 2: Release Date and Story Details" -click- "...we don't have either"
"Why Link's Hair Is Pink In Zelda: A Link To The Past" -click- "...we have no idea"
"Earth could look like Mars sooner than we think!" -click- "...in ten billion years"

Bottom-of-the-barrel trash site.

They hire people that live in their parents basements and have no clue but to troll on films. Reading alot of the reviews of people that they just clearly hire with no degree, social media presence or other forms of writing skills. Most are in high school or 1st year college. Nonsense. Don't trust them with reviews.

You Can not get free credits in rocket league just Dont believe Them they are scamers

Just read about Pulp Fiction. It is an offence to the intelligence of Tarantino.

Make you opt out of a hundred cookies to access the site....