The Guardian Reviews 132

So every paper from the Times, The Telegraph, even down to the gutter Press carries a lovely front page photo to mark the Funeral of The Duke of Edinburgh.

The Guardian carries a story about pregnant women getting Covid vaccinations, and the passing of an actress. I neither criticise or make light of either of these topics but here is the TRUE Guardian showing disregard and disrespect. Contribute to the Guardian they ask you on the website. I'd rather go and buy some tinned food and leave in our local Church. At least that is a sincere service they offer with no hidden lefty agendas.

Full of rubbish and only read by leftie snowflakes.

I really enjoy the guardian as a news outlet but I am not impressed with their subscription management. I wanted to cancel my guardian weekly subscription as going away for a while, which can be only done over the telephone with very long waiting times (over 30 minutes). With almost all subscriptions you can cancel online on your account in a few clicks. Having to call is not user-friendly and deferred me from taking a membership in the future again.

Condescending, misinformed and just generally obnoxious. You have to be a pretty horrible person to write for this rag.

Absolute TRIPE. The way they frame the political spectrum is farcical.

The sell-out The Guardian is lying about WSB switching focus to Silver. Just check r/wallstreetbets to see that this is false.

The Guardian could be an excellent paper if it was not immersed in left wing rhetoric. For a paper that 'prides' itself in its standard of journalism its determination to reject a more balanced view is hastening its demise as a newspaper, which is rather sad. In September 2020, Zoe Williams penned an article about Diane Abbott. At the end of this rather flattering piece of journalism she made the following statement: "Millions are turning to the Guardian for open, independent, quality news every day". However, in terms of circulation the newspaper has dropped from 302,000 in 2010 to 141,000 in 2020. The Guardian cannot simply lay the blame on digital versions, the i newspaper for example has increased its circulation from 133,000 to 233,000 over the same period. So at the very least, the statement above made by Zoe Williams is extremely misleading.

Written by simpletons,. Read by simpletons
SIMPLE.

I took out an offer, 6 copies for £6.00.
The magazine itself is good, but I decided it wasn't for me.
The problems occurred when I tried to cancel the subscription.
I called them in late October and was assured it was cancelled. They still billed me on the 12th November. I had to call their customer services 2-3 times, and they said it would take 5-7 working days for a refund. Luckily, I was able to cancel the direct debit with my own bank and the funds were returned to my account the day after.
It wasn't a great experience, however, the people I did speak to, were polite and apologetic.
I will not sign up for another subscription with them - too much hassle.

This website has virus, plus spam, your personal data will be stolen if you use this site! Worst of all, this is not a newspaper site, just a fascist toxic organization full of hatred.

Clickbait drivel written by social media addicted wasters.

Fed up of reading absolute rubbish that The Guardian is making up. Read an article today which was just an outright lie and its almost funny how WRONG it is

The Guardian used to be a serious left of centre/liberal newspaper. Better than the red tops and the go-to for non-sensationalist balanced news.
Since however moving to the paid supporter model for funding all that's changed.
Now it's a lefty fanzine. The editorial stance seems to be give the supporters what they want, never write an article that might challenge their hard-left views and pander to them even to the extent of censoring any contrary views in their comments sections.
It really has dropped to red top standards and is 100% tribal. Tories bad, the left good. No attempt to be honest or fact check and very very little real journalism. The 'news' seems to be copy and paste from other news sources and the bulk of the content is un-fact-checked opinion pieces masquerading as news.

Its decline is very very sad. How long it will survive is anybody's guess.

#TheSelfTrollingGuardian
The worst of the woke journoactivist LSM agitprop. Idiocy abounds, Owen Jones. Need one say more?

The best source for news online. Incredible sports reports and their Podcast Football Weekly is one of the very best.

The guardian are claiming that Americans not being able to rig the vote by mail in ballot is anti Democratic.

Couldn't make it up, or maybe the guardian could.

Utter crap

Comically bias on foreign affairs. Be is singing the praises of the EU / UN and overlooking it's issues, or smearing the USA, Brazil and UK.

You would think i would give it 1 start but i'm impressed.

Impressed that it exists, and offers what a minority of people need to get them though the day.

Everyone interests should represented by some outlet (e.g. lets not censor views, that happens too much these days), be it left ,right or centre... and at least the guardian dose not pretend to be neutral (non bias), it's openly left (far left at times)

still, only 2 stars as i have done meany studies /breakdowns on some stories that show how the Guardian will post fakes news (not always, but any fake news is bad )

Another bias rag that seeks to misinform by what they dont tell you

This "newspaper" has become a mouthpiece for left wing nutjobs like Owen Jones. There is not even any attempt at impartiality and this rag has not one ounce of journalistic integrity. I wouldn't even use this rag for compost. Any good reviews you see for this newspaper are most likely from guardian employee's.