Venice Reviews 

Misleading customers by claiming the absence of prompt injection is inaccurate, as is the claim about being uncensored. The model incorporates censorship. Although it is possible to create prompts aimed at greater uncensorship, achieving total uncensorship is impossible. This represents a blatant falsehood.

venice ai is now lying to their customers. when you bump up against their censorship guidelines..it no longer tells you oh now it returns a model not available error message telling you to try again later. so not only are they censoring (they sell themselves as non censored) but they are actively lying to their paying customers. i am a pro user. this is totally unacceptable, dishonest at its core and now lying about the censorship. unforgiveable.

I’m honestly considering buying Premium. I gave Grok, ChatGPT, and Venice the same argument—one that was genuinely hard to counter. I fully analyzed it for them and provided all the necessary context to allow for a strong, logical rebuttal. The prompt made it possible to counter with reason, but still difficult enough that it required real thought to do so well.

ChatGPT failed completely. It started inventing its own context, ignored both the argument and the context I explicitly provided, and couldn’t produce a valid counter no matter how many attempts I gave it. It also treated the argument as offensive and deliberately avoided engaging with key points.

Grok performed better. It didn’t censor itself due to “offensiveness,” but it still failed to properly comprehend the prompt and the context, which prevented it from forming a solid argument.

Venice, however, exceeded every expectation. Within just two prompts, it achieved every goal perfectly. It actually thought—carefully considering what was said, what was given, and every possible angle before landing on the strongest conclusion. What ChatGPT and Grok failed at, Venice handled effortlessly. What might’ve taken a human two hours to reason through, Venice completed in about five minutes.

I genuinely hope this AI is never changed—or at least that older versions remain available—because if future updates ever ruin it, this version deserves to always exist. Premium is absolutely worth it. It understands consistently, deeply, and accurately. Easily one of the most underrated and best AIs available.

I've never in my life actually told an AI "you're so smart" because I've never been so impressed by an AI. I've never wanted to write a 5 star review on an AI because of how smart it was.

I did that today because this AI is amazing.

I tried this AI platform because I was looking for photo editing software. I uploaded a real image and asked for an edit that stayed close to the original photo, just styled to resemble an 1800s crime syndicate family.

Instead of editing the image, it completely ignored the prompt and generated a generic, cartoon-style illustration. I reworded the request multiple times, but it never listened. It kept doing whatever it wanted instead of following clear instructions.

Within less than 10 minutes, it was obvious this was not a usable tool for serious image editing. I canceled the subscription almost immediately and requested a refund, only to be told that refunds are not allowed and all sales are final.

For something marketed as an AI image tool, the lack of responsiveness and flexibility is disappointing. Locking customers into a no-refund policy when the product does not function as expected feels wrong.

I would not recommend this platform if you are looking for accurate photo editing or prompt adherence.

This company is a scam not legitimate AI. it's probably a bunch of people in a warehouse responding as fast as they can.

Venice is awesome. It's like ChatGPT but way better for creative freedom. I like how I can experiment with multiple AI models to do what I want. They add features all the time.

The restrictions on the "uncensored model" have gotten strict to the point that this software is useless. The sh!tcoin exploitation of the users aside, the platform itself is like using a 2020 version of chatgpt. It's basically just for creating ai porn at this point. And it's much more expensive than the competitors. No redeeming qualities about this trash.

it used to be actually uncensored, but now it isn't don't waste ur money on this, venice ai has basically become chat gpt

Nice UX. Really uncensored when you choose the default mode. Many voices also to choose from. Character creation. Chats stays on your browser not their servers. Many options for settings. You can change temperature etc. You can make changes to the system prompt and change the AI behaviour or just fine tune it! Last I used the code RUNTHE20 for the yearly PRO subscription and got another 20% discount! You can also pay with crypto....

It's not perfect, but Venice doesn't tell you what to think, and doesn't try to push it's views on what is, and isn't "good taste" down your throat like ChatGPT increasingly does. For that alone it is worth subscribing. I liked it.

Venice offers the only uncensored and strongly private AI API that I am aware of. They release their custom Venice Uncensored model as open source. I'm not interested in the crypto side of it. The AI API and models are good and trustworthy in my opinion.

Looked into signing up with venice.ai and was innediately asked for a credit card because they are not 'allowed' to offer a free service in the UK.

I asked co-pilot why this was and was told this:

It isn’t a general ban on free software. The blocker is that Venice.ai’s “free tier” isn’t just software access—it’s distributing and promoting its own crypto-style usage tokens. Under UK law those tokens qualify as regulated financial instruments, and giving them away or advertising them to UK residents without FCA authorisation breaches the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) and related cryptoassets rules.

# What Venice.ai must do to “go free” in the UK

1. Remove all token-based incentives from the UK tier: make it a time- or usage-limited demo only.
2. Or obtain full FCA cryptoasset registration and approval for financial promotions.
3. Clearly separate “service trial” (software demo) from any “value credit” that users might treat as an investment.

By decoupling its free offering from any tradeable token, Venice.ai could legally reopen a UK-facing free service without breaching FSMA.

Rightly or not, this looks very much like a crypto scam. Venice should do better.

The limited amount of messages you get is just down right stupid there are way to many with unlimited messages you guys ain't special so take your trash and shove it.

Order perfume from this seller in April 25 paid through PayPal and lm still waiting, haven't heard anything, looking like have lost my money
Please be careful when ordering anything from them..

Warning - I subscribed to "Venice AI" Pro a year ago, I have tried to unsubscribe with them and their payment processor numerous times to no avail... they have made it almost impossible to unsub and cancel from them on purpose - take screenshots of everything if you are with them as the banks will need some of the details and/or an email response from them before doing anything. (they have still been trying to take said sub moneys since)

Don't buy their token. It is a rug pull. It only goes down. Their founder doesn't even comment this situation.