Daily Mail Reviews 1,545

I use to read the original format and that wasn’t brilliant but this is awful. It locks up continually and looses its place numerous times. I hate it.

haha mostly a horrific paper, with many articles about shallow influencers and other reality stars, but i guess it sometimes serves a purpose with a few good articles hidden in the middle of this low level gossip material

Has The Mail lost the plot? Just over a year ago the subscription was £9 but now it's up to £13. However, the subscription no longer carries the full newspaper and another £1.99 is needed to access exclusive stories, according to the emails they send me. It's hard to keep up with the same stories appearing on different days, perhaps a change is required.

Been doing the wheel since the start. Never won a thing. Not even the £5 or £10 gift cards

As for the newspaper they rarely print any of my letters . Instead putting in the most boring letters in history

Should be zero access for online amesss

Appalling 'Engagement Baiting' barely masked far right crud. 'There cummin' ere in smawl boats! Sumfink gives yer caaancah! 10000 homes coming to a small village like YOURS! This injection is a miracle, take THIS SUPPLEMENT (sponsored article) ... Woke wokeys engage in wokefest in the middle of the M25 IN RUSH HOUR!!! What scientists found on THIS PLANET will SHOCK YOU!!' Utter rubbish. Along the lines of those trashy independent phone in radio shows of the 1990s that encouraged over-opinionated buffoons to dial overpriced numbers in order to participate. Albeit now it is their data that they are paying with. The constant sensationalism, nonsense, obsession with pitting people against each other, barely masked casual racism, doom and gloom and don't forget - everything gives you cancer. The most worrying thing is that the DM is so popular.

The Daily Mail exploits the ignorance of those who do not fall into the ‘elite’ category, i.e. the average Joe. Engendering mistrust and division with those who are educated to a certain level. As Richard Dreyfuss coined the expression in Jaws… The Mail specialises in ‘Working class hero bull s**t’.

It’s loathing of anything perceived as slightly liberal or left leaning is legendary; witness its endless negative articles aimed at the BBC, and anything Labour suggests or promotes it will find find a reason to oppose it.

But the most divisive articles are those where they exploit minorities and engender hate and ignorance in those who choose to read it. Endless articles headed up by ridiculously unnecessary superlatives and click-bait.

This is probably the worse website in terms of functionality. Slow to load because of huge numbers or adverts. The news itself and comment section is really good, but in 2024 you'd expect the user interface to be more clean and user friendly

Awful website over sold on advertising so just spams your computer and slows everything down

NO STARS . If there was any proof of the enemy within the daily mail is surely it .

I don’t usually read this paper but a friend sent me a link to an article. When I tried to open it it states that Imust accept all their cookies(which I won’t) or pay a monthly subscription to avoid them.
Just another rip off and I certainly won’t ever read this so called newspaper

FAKE NEWS WITH MO HEART! STATING SOMEONE DIES WHEN THEY DO NOT IS A SIN.

Garbage rag that supports Trump, racism, and fear mongering. Too stupid to realize what's at stake. Piers Morgan is a very poor journalist.

Just look at any of the B.S. which this rag indulges, but the most annoying thing is how the so-called "reporters" phrase their headlines:
"Fury as....." It's never irritation or mild annoyance. It's always "fury".
"Steps out" - some celebrity is seen walking normally and they're "stepping out".
"Slammed" - someone has a slightly controversial opinion which some non-entity has started whinging about.
"Vile" - anything remotely right-wing.
And here are some more which I can't be bothered to expand upon:
"Here's why...."
"Reveals...."
"Sparks online debate"
"I'm an expert on....."
"Claps back"
"Goes wild"
Just visit their establishment boot-licking website and you'll see examples of all the above on the main page.

Makes good toilet paper to say it's a conservative propaganda n̈ews paper

Had NON deliveries from Newsteam group on 13,16,17,19,20,21 and 22 September 2024.Newsream disgracefully always mark them as delivered .Daily Mail issue a credit but just inform Newsteam of NON delivery...promised escalation has achieved nothing and it was even suggested twice that i telephone Newsteam myself to complain...UNIMPRESSED !

Full of pop ups and adverts this is no longer a comfortable site to read the news.

I'm old enough to remember when the DM was a quality newspaper, that had real inhouse journalists and not the freelancers now, who failed the GCSE English exams. Silly star struck girls writing celerity gossip is not news and should not be in a 'newspaper' nor is allowing Markle, who buys the blank pages on the site, to fill up with positive stories about how great she is, is not news either!
It's nothing but rubbish and adverts and several videos playing at the same time and more adverts and more adverts. You can't even load the comments due to the amount rubbish trying to get your attention, that it's all become unusable. What's more shocking is they don't care and don't reply to emails reg it's problems and just keep filling it with adverts and rubbish, so they keep the revenue coming in.

We used to call it 'The Daily Hate'. Nasty, rascist, right wing and full of absolute nonsense, usually made uo on purpose for malicious purposes. I wouldn't buy this paper even if all the toilet rolls run out again...

0 stars but I was compelled to give a star. The news on the tabloid is very inaccurate and poorly written. In addition to that, there's an obvious agenda being perpetuated by the far delusional right. The daily fail also relies on social media rumours as lazy journalism I can't believe people actually pay for daily fail plus. Daily fail is very racist too. The amount of cognitive dissonance on that site is wild. I remember reading a story about this white man harassing this black woman and unsurprisingly all the comments agreed and defended the white man in true delusional fashion. This shows that the people who consume this media are clearly below average intelligence.