I am the owner of Reliance Moving…
I am the owner of Reliance Moving Solutions LLC, and my experience with Engaged Financial LLC and its sales manager, Alex Holtan, has been deeply troubling. In February 2025 I signed their factoring agreement so they could advance funds against my commercial invoices and help with cash flow. In reality, I never submitted a single invoice, Engaged never purchased any accounts, and they never advanced my company one dollar. Despite that, they filed a blanket UCC lien against my business assets.
I only discovered the lien when applying for financing elsewhere. When I asked Engaged how to resolve it, I was told by Alex that I am “not eligible” for any buyout or release because I supposedly missed a 90‑day notice window, even though their services were never actually used. I requested a clear, itemized statement of any balance they claim and a concrete path to payoff and UCC‑3 termination. I have not received either.
I am not an attorney, but after reading UCC Article 9 and its Pennsylvania counterparts (13 Pa.C.S. § 9203 and § 9509), my lay understanding is that a meaningful security interest generally presumes that value has been given and the debtor has truly authorized the filing. In my case, no value was ever given—no advances, no purchased invoices—yet the UCC lien persists and I am told there is no practical exit because of their internal interpretation of a notice clause.
In my opinion, this structure is highly predatory for small businesses: you can sign dense paperwork, receive no funds whatsoever, and still find yourself burdened with a lien that interferes with future lending, while Engaged Financial and Alex Holtan refuse a straightforward, documented buyout path. Based on my experience, I would not do business with them again and urge others to obtain legal review and written answers on liens and termination before signing anything with this company.








