Dodged a bullet.
Attempted to go with Plico to obtain a home battery. We have an existing SolarEdge and Canadian Solar Panel (6.72kWh) system that is still performing really well, but apparently cannot be combined easily with any batteries. Plico recommended an 5kWh AlphaESS hybrid inverter and a 20kWh battery of the same brand to replace the existing inverter and also replace all our solar panels (even though they are only 8 years old) with new Jinko solar models to increase peak production to 8kWh.
Was all going fine until our first salesman left the company. Then went through four others.
The quote was changed to a lower capacity battery due to unknown reasons.
Then they refused to come for a site visit to properly understand the extent of the work required. Originally they wanted a $230 site visit fee, then claimed they couldn’t do them because all their 'installers' were busy. Then eventually looked at my address and realised they had a salesman that lived in the same estate.
When he came around and conducted the inspection he wanted me to contact the original installer of my existing Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) (myenergi zappi charger and harvi passive wireless current monitor) to reconnect the CT clamps that are currently connected to the grid and solar input tails of the existing inverter, which the zappi requires to read the solar and grid production, and manage its grid current draw, and enables the ability to draw exclusively from the exported solar production.
Without these the risk of overloading the three-phase breakers is increased and the EV charger won’t work correctly. As an existing appliance, they refused to articulate to me the technical reasons why they couldn’t do it.
When presented with extensively researched OEM and site specific data attempting explain the whys and technical information for there installers (to make their job easier) and to clearly articulate my concerns with not correctly integrating all the existing appliances (that were already in place at the outset of the discussion), the sales team continued to refuse to correctly quote for the additional work (which I was prepared to pay for) to rearrange the Main Switch Board circuits to avoid overloads and to remediate their intended disconnection and islanding of my EVSE.
After threatening to refer them to the CEC for their behaviour, (in spite of all my attempts to contact previous installers of the EVSE, supplying OEM information on the charger and reaching out to the OEM for assistance) I was contacted by their Sales Manager who attempted to ‘manage my expectations’, however was still unable to provide clear explanation as to why the EVSE was beyond their capability to reintegrate (which cannot possibly be the case if they are employing the claimed licensed electrical technicians).
He did indicate that he’d explore alternative options for inverters that included the capability for an EVSE such as Sigenergy, however I then received an email from the salesperson who conducted the site visit withdrawing from all arrangements.
When I attempted to contact them to clarify if they were still going to provide me with the quote related to the more capable Sigenergy system I did not receive a response.
Overall extremely disappointed and frustrated with the only non-government owned VPP provider in the state. The whole experience has like banging my head against a brick wall.
EDIT: Responding Pilco's comments on my Google review. I have received the quote for the Sigenergy 20kWh with the additional AC-coupled EVSE.
I have responded to your salesman reiterating my initial request to be quoted for a a bi-directionally capable, DC-coupled EVSE. If we are adding a second EVSE, to the home, there is little point to us installing a second AC EVSE. From a future-proofing perspective if noting else, the additional expense needs to be worth while. This was not provided nor subsequently amended. The quote was also exorbitantly more expensive (in increase of $20,000!). Frankly, I dodged a bullet with not going with Plico.
May 29, 2026
Unprompted review