Lack of Escalation Ownership After Solar Installation
My experience with SolarSquare highlights a serious gap between installation execution and post-installation accountability.
My rooftop solar system was upgraded from 5 kW to 7.56 kW through SolarSquare. The system was synchronized on 24-04-2026 and net metering approval was granted on 25-04-2026 (Reg: NT9982610410).
Despite approvals:
* sanctioned load continued to reflect incorrectly,
* net metering was not operational in billing,
* solar export units were not credited,
* and an electricity bill of ₹33,125 was generated.
The matter escalated further when a lineman arrived for electricity disconnection.
At that stage, I repeatedly contacted SolarSquare representative Naveen (9676035803), who assured me the matter would be coordinated with DISCOM and resolved.
However, my documented call logs now show:
* 30+ call attempts made by me across multiple days,
* the overwhelming majority of calls going unanswered,
* and negligible escalation ownership during an active disconnection crisis.
Despite repeated follow-ups, office visits, customer support interactions, INGRAM complaint, and CGRF escalation, meaningful resolution support was absent.
The most concerning aspect of this experience was not the existence of a technical issue. Complex projects can encounter operational problems.
The concern is the complete absence of structured escalation handling, communication continuity, and accountable post-installation support once the project moved into a billing and regulatory coordination stage.
Consumers evaluating rooftop solar providers should carefully assess not only installation capability, but also the organization’s operational maturity in handling post-installation exceptions, DISCOM coordination, and customer crisis management.
All communication records, billing records, call logs, and escalation documentation have been preserved.








