Wikitree Reviews 

3
TrustScore 3 out of 5

2.9

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more


Contact info

2.9

Average

TrustScore 3 out of 5

3 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

No history of asking for reviews

This company hasn't invited their customers, so reviews may not be representative

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

2.9

All reviews

(3)

3 reviews in the last 12 months

Write a review

We perform checks on reviews

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Please identify the “recognized tribal authorities” referred to

Please have the decency, professionalism and respect to respond to this message.
Right now you are all acting like spoiled children.

Please identify the “recognized tribal authorities” referred to in the statement:
“Most serious genealogists, historians and recognized tribal authorities reject the Shawnee Heritage series as inaccurate genealogical fiction.”
Specifically:
Which federally recognized or state-recognized Shawnee tribes are you referring to?
Which individual tribal representatives or authorities made such a determination, and what positions did they hold within their respective tribes?
When and where did each of these tribal authorities state that they rejected the *Shawnee Heritage* series as “inaccurate genealogical fiction”?
Please provide the original source for each statement, such as an official tribal publication, resolution, public statement, letter, email, meeting record, or other verifiable communication.

Did these tribal authorities review the *Shawnee Heritage* series itself before making the alleged determination, or are you interpreting comments they made about particular genealogical claims, individuals, or families as a rejection of the entire series?

Finally, did any of the tribal authorities you are citing actually use the words “genealogical fiction,” or is that WikiTree’s characterization of their position?

Because the phrase “recognized tribal authorities” invokes unnamed Native nations and tribal representatives to support a serious public accusation, I believe WikiTree should either provide clear, verifiable sources showing exactly who these authorities are and what they actually said, or remove the claim.

July 22, 2026
Unprompted review
Show reviews in all languages. (3 reviews)

Is this your company?

Claim your profile to access Trustpilot’s free business tools and connect with customers.

Get free account

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look