Operational inefficiency, lack of ethics, and zero client understanding
We tested the CPD Certification Service (Membership 22135) in parallel with the ISO 17024 qualification path through other accredited bodies (such as ASACERT), and the comparison is, unfortunately, staggering. While other organizations provided a logical, fast, and results-oriented workflow, we remained bogged down with CPD for over a month while attempting to accredit a single module. Their demands for integrations and full translations are excessive and demonstrate a total lack of understanding regarding modern e-learning platforms and the use of AI in training. This makes their model completely unscalable for providers managing large and innovative catalogs.
However, the greatest disappointment lies in their administrative and ethical management. Despite a clear incompatibility between their service and our operational needs, they refused a very reasonable partial refund request of 60%, even though we had only attempted to use 1 out of the 10 slots purchased (leaving them a 40% margin for a single assessment). This behavior shows a complete lack of client understanding and a very short-sighted business vision. Furthermore, it is highly questionable that our course was 'magically' approved only a few hours after our formal refund request—a blatant and unprofessional tactic used to justify keeping the full membership fee for work that was not completed in a timely or scalable manner. It is a shame, as we could have collaborated profitably on other markets in the future, but after this total lack of flexibility, ethics, and foresight, trust has completely vanished. Not recommended for those seeking an agile, ethical, and professional partner.
March 9, 2026
Unprompted review