The software is amazing, genuinely a must-have for photographers and hobbyists alike if you're after crisp raw files and plenty of control over your final output. The only downside is their support te... See more
Company replied
While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more
To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more
Based on reviews, created with AI
For over 20 years, DxO has been at the forefront of innovation in photographic software. We are the creators of DxO PhotoLab, widely regarded as the best RAW development software for passionate photographers. We revived the legendary Nik Collection, originally from Google, and developed essential tools like DxO PureRAW, DxO FilmPack, and DxO ViewPoint, all trusted by the most demanding photographers. Developing groundbreaking software is at the heart of what we do.
3 Rue nationale, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
Replied to 100% of negative reviews
Typically replies within 1 week
How this company uses Trustpilot
See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.
Situation was handled on a professional and timely basis.
Thank you

Reply from DxO
I have had only the best experiences with the support-team of DXO for inquiries, the support is very competent and reacts immediately!

Reply from DxO
Excellent, logical layout that has a simple workflow, achieving fantastic results.

Reply from DxO
The results are good. I do not like the menus. I do not like you do not know or cannot save when Denoise is run. I cannot see DX0 in Photoshop plugins or plugins.

Reply from DxO

Reply from DxO
The system requirements are quite demanding, which means that on my 4GB video card and 32GB RAM Ryzen 5 PC, I have to wait a ridiculously long time before the program finishes an operation. As a solution, I was told that I needed to buy a video card with 6GB, but I am still thinking about that.

Reply from DxO
So far I've been really impressed with the results from processing my images through PureRaw. Everything now goes through PureRaw first before opening in Lightroom Classic/Photoshop and provides a great base camp for processing my images. With PureRaw I no longer worry about using a higher ISO. It's been a valuable purchase. It does the job efficiently and to a high standard.

Reply from DxO
DxO PureRAW is excellent… but the upgrade policy is not
I’ve been using DxO products since the OpticsPro days, and PureRAW itself is genuinely excellent. That’s precisely why this experience is so disappointing.
I purchased PureRAW 5 on November 19, 2025. Four months later, PureRAW 6 was released—and despite being a very recent customer, I’m expected to pay the upgrade fee with no meaningful grace period.
This isn’t about misunderstanding the policy. I’m aware of how their upgrade system works. The issue is how unforgiving it is in practice, especially for customers who purchased shortly before a new major release without any visibility into what was coming.
At the time of purchase, the messaging around updates their Marketing reinforced the idea that I was buying into the current state-of-the-art version. Then, just a few months later, a new major version arrives, effectively making that purchase feel outdated almost immediately, and it hurts so much their selling point of is your forever (outdated but yours forever) Vs a subscription
DxO’s own support documentation confirms that only purchases made after a specific cutoff date may qualify for a limited-time offer, sometimes sent by email—and that there are “no exceptions” for anyone earlier. In reality, this means that even very recent buyers fall outside any reasonable upgrade window.
To be sincere this made me soo angry, and not sure why frustates so much, I guess is the sense that it broke the trust I could have around this Company. It feels like am just another dumb buyer, that just fell into the marketing trap... perhaps I am dumb afterall because this happened to me with Photolab 4 as well!! lol
Because of this, buying DxO products near the end of a version cycle becomes a gamble because you never now when that cycle ends or begins!—and that’s not a position customers should be in.
PureRAW is still a strong tool (the best denoising to be fair), but I would strongly recommend that potential buyers take this into account before purchasing. As for me, this experience has significantly damaged my confidence in DxO probably forever, and I hope they reconsider and introduce a fair, transparent grace period for upgrades, so at least other could avoid so much frustration. Thanks

Reply from DxO
I love the product. It realy helps to manage noise and enhance my photos.
THe only reason I don't give 5 stars is because I bougth the product a few weeks before the release of DXO PureRaw 6 and can't upgrade to this new release for free. Which I think should be the case.

Reply from DxO
Quick reply and good effort to solve my problems.
Thumbs up.

Reply from DxO
I had an older Nik collection from early on and I tried the DxO version and found some great presets. Easy ordering and great support as I had issues migrating it to the desktop.

Reply from DxO
Had a problem with Photo Lab 9,contacted you Shane responded and suggested a few thing's to do ,found out that it was my fault not the program's ,just receiving the help from Shane and the response time was great and helpful ,keep up the good work on both programming and support. John

Reply from DxO
PL9 is limited pre-sets available (eg Fujifilm pre-sets are not available for Nikon cameras as they were with PL9.

Reply from DxO
The software is amazing, genuinely a must-have for photographers and hobbyists alike if you're after crisp raw files and plenty of control over your final output. The only downside is their support team, specifically one person, always seems annoyed to be asked for help. Other than that, there's some really powerful tools here.

Reply from DxO
Having used DXO PureRAW since version one, through the current (and best) version six, my view is it is the best RAW pre-processor, bringing out the very best in the basic image, so it can be worked on to process a pleasing, noise-free and sharp final image.
I use Lightroom Classic as my DAM and have tried Topaz; but in my view PureRAW is rather better than either at reducing noise and correcting lens issues.

Reply from DxO
Simply the best noise removal and optical correction software there is. I don't give a 5 star because it works very slow and the cooperation with CaptureOne could be more seamingless.

Reply from DxO
LET ME PUT THIS AT THE TOP - NIK 7 AND 8 WERE ON MY MACHINE. I HAD PAID SEPARATELY FOR BOTH VERSIONS - ONE WAS AN UPGRADE AND THE OTHER WAS A FULL VERSION PRICE. I BOUGHT A NEW MACHINE AND THEY DID NOT WORK. I TRIED MANAGING MY LICENSES THROUGH THE WEBSITE AND GOT THE SAME ERROR MESSAGES. I TOOK SCREENSHOTS AND SENT THEM TO DXO. THEY WERE KIND AND UNDERSTANDING, BUT THEY COULD NOT HELP. THEY SENT IT TO ANOTHER SUPPORT TECH. THIS PERSON WAS REALLY RUDE, DISMISSIVE AND UNSUPPORTIVE. THEY DID NOT READ THE ORIGINAL TICKET AND WERE CONDESCENDING. THAT IS THE REASON FOR THIS REVIEW.
I am walking away from DXO and NIK as of today - after many, many years. I bought and paid for NIK from the original company. I paid every time they had a new version and I paid for multiple machines. Google eventually bought it and actually made it free for a while. Eventually, DXO bought it and began to charge. I dutifully paid, then I'd upgrade for one cycle, then I'd pay again. This went on for years - again, with me paying for at least two licenses at a time to use on 4 machines total.
The last few times I migrated machines, it would lock me out and I'd have to do a lengthy back and forth with their support people to free up activations. No easy way I ever found to do that. Well, it happened again today. I wrote to them, wasting time out of my life to do it, and got back a few polite, perfunctory replies. Eventually, someone sent me on to a person who could allegedly help. What I got back from this person was a disgustingly facile response. They had not read the thread. They ignored my history of purchases, and they could not help me with even one activation.
I was amazed at how rude and arrogant they were for a support person, so I wrote back with a partial list of my serial numbers back 7 or 8 years, then told them I was never going to use them again, which I intend to do. It's not worth it. First off, it's just not worth it for a cost/value benefit. Second, it's not worth the time, to be abused by some dweeb who did not even read my initial support ticket. I rarely get so pissed off, but I'm very brand loyal and this was a real slap in the face.
I don't even use plugins often. I'll either poke around for something new or just use Photoshop, which I have used for over 30 years now. To hell with DXO.

Reply from DxO
Great noise reduction software. Now I can use my micro four thirds camera without reservations.

Reply from DxO
PureRaw5 works really very well
Stand alone and as Lightroom Classic plug
I am also satisfied with the Technical Support

Reply from DxO
Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.
Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.
Learn more about other kinds of reviews.
We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.
Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.
Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.
Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.
Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.