Contrary to a company response from a…
Contrary to a company response to a review here in december 2025, the futura sciences (English speaking news site at least) does use AI generated articles.
They also don't always use personal signatures as in the company response mentioned earlier, but only 'futura team" in many articles.
In this day and age of AI generated content, this is just a way to try to be non-transparent about the issue of AI-generated content.
For example, I read a whole article about the topic on how dolphins and orcas may be evolving back to land life, at least according to the article topic. Then the whole article describes the complete opposite, on how evolution has gone to a point of no return, so dolphins and orcas actually never can acquire traits needed to return to land life again.
There is no name attached to the article besides "futura team", no box or email adress in the article where you can send notices of factual errors, and a supposedly science magazine can not be so illiterate that the article topic is the direct opposite of the article itself.
All this shows that futura sciences (the English speaking version of the website) clearly uses AI generated content. A shame.
Reply from Futura
Hello Tommy,
Thank you for your feedback and for pointing out the specific issue with the Dolphins/Orcas article.
Correction: You were absolutely right regarding the inconsistency between the title and the conclusion. We have corrected the article immediately.
Editorial Process: The 'Futura Team' signature represents our internal editorial staff, not an automated bot. However, we acknowledge that human oversight failed in this specific instance regarding the headline accuracy.
Quality Commitment: We are currently reinforcing our proofreading and validation workflows to ensure total coherence in our content.
We apologize for the confusion this article caused and appreciate you holding us to a high standard.
Guillaume (CEO)