Appealservice Reviews 

47
TrustScore 1.5 out of 5

1.3

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

See what reviewers are saying

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

No compassion for bereavement, did not take into account my circumstances. Waste of time. They represent greater Anglia and the whole system is not there really for the genuine hard working person who... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

As countless others here have pointed out, this is a scam organisation - set up in cahoots with their fellow hustlers Greater Anglia in order to rinse some more cash out of rail travellers. Great Brit... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

These bunch of cowboys need a dose of Margret Thatchers Beeching treatment. Totally unfit for purpose. Their concrete thinking is so one dimensional it can’t take in to account Bank Holidays and posta... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Totally useless, they don't comment on staff behaviour or how they acted around the issuing of a fine. They just follow through on the fact that a ticket wan't bought, therefore appeal is unsucc... See more

Company details


Contact info

1.3

Bad

TrustScore 1.5 out of 5

47 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

No history of asking for reviews

This company hasn't invited their customers, so reviews may not be representative

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

1.3

All reviews

(47)

13 reviews in the last 12 months

Write a review
Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Vultures

The people who are running this should be in jail. Passengers are getting penalized because of not properly functioning Oyster card readers. This is a completely unfair system. A faulty machine is provided at Swanley station and a crowd of white male vultures working for Southeastern are waiting on the other side on the line. They are not listening to any reasoning and issuing unfair penalties. The appeal service sends out only a robotic copy past text rejecting any appeal. Cheating criminals, that's what this is.

March 26, 2019
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I was stopped today 12/12/2018 in…

I was stopped today 12/12/2018 in Hounslow Central (zone 4) by a badge Inspector LU0245 and I gave a fine of £ 40 because I was an egg of zone I having a ticket with zone 2-6 included. It did not was able to prove that I was wrong, just gave me the fine, a very badly educated, very disgusting guy

December 12, 2018
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Neither "Independent" nor competent

In May I received a so-called "Penalty Fare Notice" from a bus inspector (badge: LB3607) despite him seeing my valid Oyster card with sufficient credit and proof that it was indeed mine. Although I was annoyed with this bus inspector and have made a complaint against him, I am much more angry with the organizations "Appealservice.co.uk" and "IRCAS" who are working together on behalf of TFL and pursuing this ineligible payment against me.

The staff at "Appealservice.co.uk", notably an 'A. Lopez', cannot work out that I was a Customer when one of their silly bus inspectors decided to issue me with a £40 penalty on a bus 427 on 8 May 2018. I have supplied the clowns at "Appealservice.co.uk" with hard proof that I was and still am a customer of TFL. They have received digital scans of my valid photo ID, Oyster Card and screenshots of THEIR online records confirming that my oyster card expired on 16 May 2018.

"As you were unable to
produce your photocard, the Inspector was correct to issue a Penalty." is what "Appealservice.co.uk" wrote to me in a letter after they apparently turned down my appeal of the 'penalty fare notice'

As a Customer, the Inspector was wrong because he had the means to find out that the Valid Oyster card I was carrying, belonged to me. Didn't he have a phone which would have been connected to a computer database conforming my Customer status? Didn't I swipe my valid Oyster card before sitting down?

However, silliness of that bus inspector has been surpassed by the silliness of "Appealservice.co.uk" who, despite being supplied with more more information, still cannot work out I was a Customer on that bus trip.

June 4, 2018
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Rigged system?

The response to the appeal of my train fare penalty made didn't relate to or make any sense regarding what I had laid out in my appeal. Seems they just copy and pasted from a script and now there is no other way to appeal it. It may only be £20 but I'm on 0 hours at the moment that's not a small amount to me and now with no other way to appeal it. I feel I've been mistreated by them and both SWR when I've used that line at that time for over a year

January 31, 2018
Unprompted review
Show reviews in all languages. (47 reviews)

Is this your company?

Claim your profile to access Trustpilot’s free business tools and connect with customers.

Get free account

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look