Audika - St Albans Reviews 

173
TrustScore 5 out of 5

4.9

Market Place 10, AL3 5DG St Albans, England, GB


While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

See what reviewers are saying

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I've been with Hidden Hearing/Audika for a number of years now and honestly can't recommend them enough. The care and support I've received has always been excellent, with regular check-ups and a... See more

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I visited Audika in St Albans for ear wax removal and was really impressed with the whole experience. Olivia was extremely welcoming and friendly, making me feel comfortable from the moment I walked t... See more

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I was seen straight away- I didn’t think I had a hearing problem but attended at the request of my spouse ( how often have you heard that 😉). Was seen on time by very efficient Colin . No great hea... See more

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Used Hidden Hearing, 10, Market Place, St Albans for ear wax removal by micro suction done Dec 22 by Roopa Samani. Excellent work. I used Spire Harpenden Hospital ENT consultants costing £300 each tim... See more



Contact info

  • Market Place 10, AL3 5DG, St Albans, England, United Kingdom

  • 01727 894966

4.9

Excellent

TrustScore 5 out of 5

173 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Asks customers to review

This company invites their customers to review, whether positive or negative

At Trustpilot, it's all about human content. This business can also access our AI-assisted response tool which helps them draft replies.

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

4.9

All reviews

(173)

4,835 reviews in the last 12 months

Write a review
Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Very impressed

Very impressed especially by Tamsin the lovely patient caring & extremely helpful hearing aid assistant. A great improvement on NHS hearing aids & so nice to have someone who care.

March 18, 2022
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

fantastic service

Thank you so much Rupa, of the St. Albans branch. The wax in my ears was so impacted that it made me dizzy and I could hardly hear, plus tinnitus very badly. It took 4 goes but Rupa did not give up. She gave me clear instructions on how to oil and massage, and voila, this week she managed to clear the stubborn wax. Very, very grateful. And such a pleasant, patient person will recommend.

March 17, 2022
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Thoroughly recommend

Roopa arrived on time and explained all parts of the procedure really clearly. She was a very nice lady and has cleared the wax from one of my ears thoroughly. The other needs a bit more and she will do this next week. She took videos and showed me all that was going on with my ears. I would thoroughly recommend this service at hidden hearing.

February 23, 2022
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

could not get doctors appointment

Partner could not get doctors appointment to clear ear wax so called St Albans branch, fitted in that afternoon, excellent professional service from Roopa Samani, lovely lady, and only £5 more than Specsavers.

January 28, 2022
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Patronizing

I was told to bring someone with me for most accurate results as a familiar voice was needed. I rescheduled and travelled some distance in order to do so. The Audiologist decided not to even finish the test (made his mind up and said he didn't think it would change the result), so I needn't have brought anyone. Made comments throughout about how he didn't know why I "thought" I had an issue hearing things.

When taking down my medicine, I mentioned my Allergic Rhinitis (AR) and he waved this off as "Coming and going with the seasons due to pollen. It will affect hearing in the same way someone having a cold does." This doesn't seem to correlate with the medical publications and studies that show it can cause damage to the hairs on the cochlear and thereby causing sensorineural hearing loss. This is potentially due to the increased nature of otitis media. AR is not the same as Seasonal, though this is one type that comes under the umbrella. Allergic Rhinitis also includes being flared by dust, dog hair and as the ENT Dr told me "Generally being allergic to life." This is not what prompted me to come, but WAS a relevant factor.

When I finished one part, he even made a crack about how the person I had brought (who was a lot older than me) would probably do worse than me and invited them to have a go.

He told me I was fine, and went on to say my hearing was that of someone in their mid-forties (I am in my late 20s). Told me it was something I just have to deal with, like the fact he has to deal with that he is bad at table tennis.

Incorrectly performed Rinne test. (Asked which I heard better: behind the ear or through the ear, as opposed to asking me to signal when I could no longer hear via each mode.)

Incorrectly recorded Weber result as thought my prior ear infection had been in opposite ear. (Verbally, at least. Presumably in his eagerness to discredit me. Unclear what was recorded in writing.)

After trying to keep him on track from giving the other person an impromptu mini-test to mock me and then talking about his table tennis club, he finally mentioned a total of 1 thing that I could do to improve my hearing: in crowded rooms, sit with my back to the nosiest part.

At the beginning of the appointment, he had told me that someone my age should be 0+. My score was -10 and below, with my overall score being -15db. Certainly not terrible, but not to be sniffed at when the test wasn't even completed.

After a disappointing attitude, I asked if I could be emailed a copy of the result. E.g. a print screen of the audiogram. (This way I could take a look at the numbers which are objective, without his skepticism painting over everything.) The Audiologist snapped that he had spent 45 minutes with me, that it was a free test and he won't be writing me up a report because this wasn't the NHS. I was quite taken aback by this -not least because a fair amount of this was due to his own choice to test the person I brought with me, in order to try and make a point. (Something neither of us had asked of him.) I also hadn't asked him to write up a report, but a copy of the result which the website says will be shared with you afterwards.

I asked if I could take a photo of the audiogram as it was on the screen and he reluctantly let me, but I only got a photo of one ear before he promptly locked his screen.

After lots of research, I can see that the trend of my audiogram shows reverse-slope AKA low-frequency hearing loss (slight). Apparently this type of hearing loss is incredibly rare. Due to a number of my comorbidities, this is likely something I will need to monitor closely.

I appreciate that you only offer free hearing tests with the hopes of selling a hearing aid afterwards, but you really shouldn't be punishing people for not having the range of hearing you want them to. Not to mention, (from the considerable research I have taken into hearing aid settings for low-frequency hearing loss) even the Audiologist's understanding of how a hearing aid could be utilized or impact someone with this TYPE of hearing loss was completely lacking in any form of nuance as it didn't account for the difference in settings that would be used on the hearing aid.

For the avoidance of doubt, I agree that I am not a hearing aid candidate. However, the complete lack of professionalism and lack of general kindness/empathy that would be expected when dealing with people experiencing hearing loss was beyond disappointing. It is incredibly frustrating asking people to repeat themselves constantly, only to essentially be told "It's all in your head."

To put it in the Audiologist's OWN words: he is not a medical professional. He is merely trained to perform a test and examine the results.

Sadly, this also didn't seem to be entirely possible either.

UPDATE: I was later diagnosed with Auditory Processing Disorder at Royal National ENT.

January 22, 2022
Unprompted review
Audika - St Albans logo

Reply from Audika - St Albans

Hi,

Thank you for taking the time to leave your review and feedback. We am sorry to hear about your recent experience at our St Albans clinic.

What you have described is not the level of service we want to provide. Our customers are at the heart of everything we do and we pride ourselves on trying to provide the highest level of service possible.

Our hearing tests are free and without obligation so when a customer has a result that shows they do not require hearing aids, we certainly do not want them to feel like they have wasted our time. So, we are sorry to hear you felt this was the case.

I have requested your details via Trustpilot as we would like to investigate the matter further. We would appreciate it if you could provide these please.

Kind regards,
David - Hidden Hearing

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look